Tornado Catamaran

Would gas from compressed air and lighter than plunged into arcs tend to produce positive buoyancy thereby resist submarining?

Would such an increase in positive buoyancy advantage of speed catamaran, catamaran versus stock provided all things being equal?

Why do manufacturers use a sail mast? And would a top sheet mastless generate faster speeds of the hull?

And, should not have a flexible connecting struts catamaran hull, for a certain amount of flex in the hull would remain in the water longer?

Could a tornado be used as a platform to use the experimental setup sheet than anything that exists today?

Yes, a catamaran can reach a conventional hull speed beyond 60 mph if it is twisted. Overall, there would be an increase hull speed, nominal, increasing positive buoyancy forward and removing the rigidity of the struts also increase the hull speed.

But the real factor is the leaf. A sheet of lower pole is innovative and superior to a mast. What a mast: a dead bat stuck in the air to hang the skins of animals or on the web, primitive by any standard.

Thus, the film would be the key to generate speeds above 60 mph, and instead of a tornado can be a C-Class would be a better platform?

not unless you go to the ice and the lake

When you compress a gas, it becomes heavier ...

And the buoyancy on the motion, which implies volume, not mass. If you put in a container under pressure, which tend to be higher which equals heavier, you add the weight of the ship ...
For nature, you speak volumes, the difference is insignificant, if you use air, helium or styrofoam. You will have little or no "lift" from the gas itself and no difference in the movement.

The point of buoyancy bags filled with air bags is to move the water, without adding weight .. not to create a lift.

Therefore, the balloons must be so great to get enough lift to the trouble .... displacement ..